Here is an email I received this morning for email processor work. Email processing is just an online version of stuffing envelopes and should be avoided at all costs! Tip offs to this scam include words like “guaranteed” regarding income, “no experience required” and huge payouts for menial work. If you get an email like the one below, delete it.

Scam Email:

Dear Internet Entrepreneur,

How Many Emails Can You Process A Day?

Can You Process 30 Emails a Day? If You Can…

You’ll Earn $750.00 Every Day!
GUARANTEED!

Earn $25.00 For Every Email You Process!
You will be Supplied with all of the Information to Send Out

You Are Guaranteed To Get Paid Instantly For Each Email You Process!

This is an Easy, Profitable Opportunity to Earn $1000’s Every Week From Home.

No Experience Required.

——————————————————————————–

Your Earnings Are Unlimited… Below are your potential earnings!!!

5 e-mails processed 5x$25.00 = $125 Per Day!
10 e-mails processed 10x$25.00 = $250 Per Day!
25 e-mails processed 25x$25.00= $625 Per Day!
30 e-mails processed 25x$25.00= $750 Per Day!

$273,750 a Year Income!

Earn $25.00 Per E-mail You Process! Your earnings are Guaranteed!

Make $150.00 in Two Hours Easily.

30 email per week X $25.00= $750.00 per week

CLICK HERE

Sincerely,

Successful One

 Share

• Submit Favorite Social Media
  
  • Subscribe
  • Bloglines
  • Blogmarks
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Furl
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati

Its bad enough to lose your money to scammers. But these days, work-at-home con artists are costing its victims way more than their money. Sometimes the victims even get arrested! The postal service has indicated that a “repackaging” scam is getting worse. In this scam, victims either get an email or see a job online involving freight. The victim receives items in the mail, repackages them, and sends them off to the scammer. For his trouble he’s paid $20 to $40 per package. The scam is that the items are being bought with stolen credit cards. By receiving stolen goods, you can go to jail. So this scam isn’t so much about stealing your money, as setting you up as the fall guy once the police track the credit card activity.

This is another scam that if you use common sense, you should have some concerns. Any legitimate company shouldn’t have any problem receiving packages. That just doesn’t make sense.

 Share

• Submit Favorite Social Media
  
  • Subscribe
  • Bloglines
  • Blogmarks
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Furl
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati

Update: Mattceni @Twitter asked that I let you know that if you get an email like the one I received below using FexEx’s name, you can report it to abuse@fedex.com

Here’s a scam that came through my email this weekend. You’ll notice all sorts of problems with this email. The part that really got me giggling was the contact person: BR. Goodluck Jonathan. At least if I’m ready it right, that is the contact person. The grammar and organization of this email is so bad its hard to be sure. I think I’ll avoid doing business with anyone named “Goodluck” though. You’ll also note that the FedEx email given is a Yahoo Account. I think FedEx does well enough that it would have its own email account. Use of free commercial accounts (Yahoo, Gmail, Hotmail) for a large company is a tip off that its likely a scam.

This scam will either be a fake check scam or similar to the Nigerian scams in which you’re asked to send money to get the process started. Either way, you should avoid it.

Scam Email:

Hello
i have paid the delivery fees for your cheque and all the
necessary arrengement has made WITH FEDEX COMPANY and manager of
ecobank told me that the cheque will expire before getting
to you. so i told him to cash the $7.2 milion and deposited
the cash with fedex courier company .now contact the
fedex company with this information
BELOW CONTACT PERSON;BR.GOODLUCK JONATHAN,
Email;(fedex_delivery5@yahoo.co.nz)
Send your Name, Address,Telephone and a Copy of
picture to them, and remember that fedex company dont know
the content of the box, because i registered it as africa
cloth.
Dr.DONNA JEO (ESQ)
GOD IS GOOD

Ahora también puedes acceder a tu correo Terra desde el móvil.

Infórmate pinchando aquí.

 Share

• Submit Favorite Social Media
  
  • Subscribe
  • Bloglines
  • Blogmarks
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Furl
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati

I’ve been getting a lot of emails lately telling me:

If you can process 30 a day,

you’ll earn $750.00 every day!

GUARANTEED!

The first tip off that this is not what its cracked up to be is the word “guaranteed”. No one guarantees what you can earn. Even an employer calls it a salary or wage but never uses the word guaranteed.

The next tip off is the “small registration fee  to help cover our expenses in maintaining and developing these programs. You are not paying for employment. You are paying for our services in bringing you this incredible opportunity!” Employers never, ever charge for supplies. Imagine your current boss charged you for paper clips or use of the desk. You’d think he was nuts!

Throughout the entire sales letter you don’t learn what the processing is. But there is a clue: “You will be supplied with all of the information to send out, nothing you send will ever be inappropriate.All you have to do is “cut and paste” the same messages and send out the e-mails.”

This is what I call online envelop stuffing. The materials you send are mostly a copy of the email you received. When people respond to your email by clicking on your site and ordering, you get an email that you “process” by sending the same information you got.

I’m not sure how the person earns $25 for every email when the registration is only $15. I can only guess that there is an upsell or hidden expense somewhere.

The final reason you don’t want to fall for these programs (besides that they don’t work and if they did it just means you’d be a scammer too), is that there is no money back guarantee.

 Share

• Submit Favorite Social Media
  
  • Subscribe
  • Bloglines
  • Blogmarks
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Furl
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati

It happens at least once a month. I get a letter in the mail indicating that I need to renew my website domain or risk losing the site. Because these letters are not from the place I register my domains, I throw them out. But I sometimes wonder how many people pay and lose money to this scam.

The FTC posted a news item in which it filed a complaint against a Toronto Canada company that was sending bogus domain registration invoices to US small businesses.  Data Business Solutions, Inc’s US assets have been frozen pending a trial. The company also does business as:  Internet Listing Service Corp., ILS Corp., ILSCORP.NET, Domain Listing Service Corp., DLS Corp., and DLSCORP.NET. The principals involved are Ari Balabanian, Isaac Benlolo and Kirk Mulveney.

The investigation has involved a variety of agencies and organizations including Toronto Strategic Partnership (made up of the FTC, US Postal Inspection Services, Competition Bureau Canada, the Toronto Police Service – Fraud Squad, the Ontario Ministry of Government Services, the Ontario Provincial Police – Anti-Rackets, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, and the United Kingdom’s Office of Fair Trading) , Microsoft Corporation, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), the Better Business Bureau of Chicago and Northern Illinois and Wild West Domains, Inc.

The important thing to remember here is that the only domain registration invoice or information should come from the company you bought the domain from. Most provide online management and renewal and will also send you email notices when renewals are due.

 Share

• Submit Favorite Social Media
  
  • Subscribe
  • Bloglines
  • Blogmarks
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Furl
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati

This scam was submitted by a Work-At-Home Success subscriber who applied for a job online. After the initial inquiry, she was told she would have an interview through Yahoo Messenger. Although the name of the interviewer was James Dorothy instead of James Walters, she proceeded with the interview. But then they asked her to open an account at Wells Fargo, she got suspicious. “I asked why the checking account and they said so you can send our shipping agent the remainder of the money after you withdraw 150.00.” (RED FLAG!!) Being a smart job hunter, she asked to think about it.

In the meantime, they sent her to a website to learn more about them.  She visited the website and found a legitimate company specializing in recruitment. This is when our smart job hunter became brilliant. She decided to call the number on the website. “The receptionists said “Oh, no, here we go again.” ” Apparently, this scammer has been using this legitimate company as a cover thinking that people won’t contact the company. I hate to think how often they were right about that. Fortunate for the woman who contacted me, she thought to call. Further, she took the time to contact me so that I could warn you all!

Remember, LEGITIMATE COMPANIES WILL NEVER ASK TO USE YOUR PERSONAL ACCOUNT OR ASK YOU TO OPEN AN ACCOUNT FOR THE PURPOSE OF DOING BUSINESS!

Avoid business dealings with the following:

 Share

• Submit Favorite Social Media
  
  • Subscribe
  • Bloglines
  • Blogmarks
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Furl
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati

Recently, the Federal Trade Commission reported that it finally obtained the proceeds of a $100,000 performance bond from repeat offender Richard Neiswonger. Neiswonger was found in contempt of a 1997 injunction preventing him from deceptively marketing business opportunities.

There are rules for marketing and even if your business opportunity is legit, you can get in trouble if you violate the rules set up by the Federal Trade Commission. For example, you can’t misrepresent your program and you have to disclose the material facts of the program. Some programs require written documents that provide average income earnings, return policies and more. To learn more, visit the FTC for free guides and information on business opportunities and franchises.

 Share

• Submit Favorite Social Media
  
  • Subscribe
  • Bloglines
  • Blogmarks
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Furl
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati

I got the email below this morning indicating I have money owed to me. Woo hoo. The problem is that the email is so unprofessional and as far as I know, the IRS doesn’t have my email. Ormaybe since Homeland Security it does, but I’m pretty sure it would mail me a letter or just direct deposit any money it’s sending (like the stimulus money).

I’m sure you can spot the errors, such as:

1. Its not actually addressed to me…or anyone.
2. It says its a refund under section 501(c) (3) which I’m pretty sure is the code for a non-profit. I don’t own or run a non-profit.
3. Its says “If u don’t receive a refund…” Reading IRS documents is cumbersome, but I don’t think they’d resort to text message grammar to confuse us even more.

This is another phishing email. Remember, never click on a link in an email and submit sensitive information such as logins, passwords, bank account numbers or social security.

After the last annual calculations of your fiscal activity
we have determined that you are eligible to receive
a tax refund under section 501(c) (3) of the
Internal Revenue Code. Tax refund value is $189.60.
Please submit the tax refund request and allow us 6-9 days
in order to IWP the data received.
If u don’t receive your refund within 9 business
days from the original IRS mailing date shown,
you can start a refund trace online.

If you distribute funds to other organization, your records must show wether
they are exempt under section 497 (c) (15). In cases where the recipient org.
is not exempt under section 497 (c) (15), you must have evidence the funds will
be used for section 497 (c) (15) purposes.

If you distribute fund to individuals, you should keep case histories showing
the recipient’s name and address; the purpose of the award; the maner of
section; and the realtionship of the recipient to any of your officers, directors,
trustees, members, or major contributors.

To access the form for your tax refund, please click here

This notification has been sent by the Internal Revenue Service,
a bureau of the Department of the Treasury.

Sincerely Yours,

John Stewart
Director, Exempt. Organization
Rulings and Agreements Letter
Internal Revenue Service

 Share

• Submit Favorite Social Media
  
  • Subscribe
  • Bloglines
  • Blogmarks
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Furl
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati

The FTC has approved changes to the CAN SPAM Act which regulates how businesses can and cannot sent email. In the past the rules have included:

1) Senders email must be clear (no email spoofing…using someone else’s email).

2) Email needs to have a clear unsubscribe notice.

3) Advertising must be labled as an ad in the subject.

The new changes are:

“The new rule provisions address four topics:

(1) an e-mail recipient cannot be required to pay a fee, provide information other than his or her e-mail address and opt-out preferences, or take any steps other than sending a reply e-mail message or visiting a single Internet Web page to opt out of receiving future e-mail from a sender;

(2) the definition of “sender” was modified to make it easier to determine which of multiple parties advertising in a single e-mail message is responsible for complying with the Act’s opt-out requirements;

(3) a “sender” of commercial e-mail can include an accurately-registered post office box or private mailbox established under United States Postal Service regulations to satisfy the Act’s requirement that a commercial e-mail display a “valid physical postal address”; and

(4) a definition of the term “person” was added to clarify that CAN-SPAM’s obligations are not limited to natural persons.”

I’m not a lawer so I’m not sure what a “natural person” is … as compared to just a person. But it will pay to find out as violating the CAN SPAM Act can cost you some money plus loss of your Internet services.

To learn more about the changes in the CAN SPAM Act visit the FTC.

 Share

• Submit Favorite Social Media
  
  • Subscribe
  • Bloglines
  • Blogmarks
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Furl
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati

The internet is a great place to find information on working at home. However you can’t always trust the information you find. I’m a big believer in being able to see the source whenever someone makes a “claim”. Recently I was looking for some podcasts on working at home and a sponsored Google link popped up calling itself the Site Review Authority. The site was a sales letter (first tip off that its not a review or information site) that said how nearly all work-at-home offers are scams. It then went on the say it found only three programs that worked. The first was a “rebate” program. While not a scam, its not a rebate either.

Rebate programs are programs that sell you information on how to make money with affiliate programs. In fact all three programs on this site were a variation of selling information on making money with affiliate programs. Affiliate programs are a viable way to make money online; however, many of these programs don’t say that. They give the impression that its a job or requires very little work. They fail to mention the cost of running the ads they’ll have you run or that you could lose your shirt if its done improperly.

If you want to make money with affiliate programs, check out anything by Rosalind Gardner (she has a print book through Amazon and an excellent ebook as well). It will be more affordable and more realistic.

When you come across sites that say they “review” programs or help you avoid scams, but then try to sell you on their “approved” programs, be careful. While many work-at-home experts will recommend resources, sites that promote themselves as the watchdogs of scams without providing copious information, resources and places to check out their claims should be suspect.

 Share

• Submit Favorite Social Media
  
  • Subscribe
  • Bloglines
  • Blogmarks
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Furl
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati